Probably, but you can use it to influance a jury first.
patticharron March 4th
You cannot introduce recordings made without the individual’s knowledge unless you have a court order to do so. Your attorney might be able to tell the other side that he has this recording, etc and use it as leverage, but it is highly doubtful you can introduce it as evidence unless there are extraordinary circumstances that allow the judge to rule to allow it.
nana2ten March 4th
An audio tape without the other persons knowledge can come back to slap you. Its called entrapment.
Boston March 4th
NY is a one-party state, meaning that only one person on the recording needs to know the conversation is being recorded.
lordreith March 4th
This is called a bugged or wired conversation and New York City is one of those jurisdictions that requires all parties to a conversation to consent before the conversation can be intercepted or recorded. Thus, it itself is against the law.
N.Y. Penal Law ยงยง 250.00, 250.05 makes it a class E felony to record or listen to a conversation without the consent of the other party.
No state permits recordings of this nature to be used as evidence.
This author has not yet written a description. Please give them some time to get acquainted with the site and surely they will write their masterpiece.
Miotch March 4th
Probably, but you can use it to influance a jury first.
patticharron March 4th
You cannot introduce recordings made without the individual’s knowledge unless you have a court order to do so. Your attorney might be able to tell the other side that he has this recording, etc and use it as leverage, but it is highly doubtful you can introduce it as evidence unless there are extraordinary circumstances that allow the judge to rule to allow it.
nana2ten March 4th
An audio tape without the other persons knowledge can come back to slap you. Its called entrapment.
Boston March 4th
NY is a one-party state, meaning that only one person on the recording needs to know the conversation is being recorded.
lordreith March 4th
This is called a bugged or wired conversation and New York City is one of those jurisdictions that requires all parties to a conversation to consent before the conversation can be intercepted or recorded. Thus, it itself is against the law.
N.Y. Penal Law ยงยง 250.00, 250.05 makes it a class E felony to record or listen to a conversation without the consent of the other party.
No state permits recordings of this nature to be used as evidence.
Add Yours
YOU