Comments on: is an audio tape recording of a conversation without the other person knowing admisable in a nyc court.? http://www.nowknow.com/is-an-audio-tape-recording-of-a-conversation-without-the-other-person-knowing-admisable-in-a-nyc-court/ Now Know - Search Millions of Public Records & Resources Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:28:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Miotch http://www.nowknow.com/is-an-audio-tape-recording-of-a-conversation-without-the-other-person-knowing-admisable-in-a-nyc-court/comment-page-1/#comment-14880 Miotch Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=3992#comment-14880 Probably, but you can use it to influance a jury first. Probably, but you can use it to influance a jury first.

]]> By: patticharron http://www.nowknow.com/is-an-audio-tape-recording-of-a-conversation-without-the-other-person-knowing-admisable-in-a-nyc-court/comment-page-1/#comment-14881 patticharron Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=3992#comment-14881 You cannot introduce recordings made without the individual's knowledge unless you have a court order to do so. Your attorney might be able to tell the other side that he has this recording, etc and use it as leverage, but it is highly doubtful you can introduce it as evidence unless there are extraordinary circumstances that allow the judge to rule to allow it. You cannot introduce recordings made without the individual’s knowledge unless you have a court order to do so. Your attorney might be able to tell the other side that he has this recording, etc and use it as leverage, but it is highly doubtful you can introduce it as evidence unless there are extraordinary circumstances that allow the judge to rule to allow it.

]]> By: nana2ten http://www.nowknow.com/is-an-audio-tape-recording-of-a-conversation-without-the-other-person-knowing-admisable-in-a-nyc-court/comment-page-1/#comment-14882 nana2ten Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=3992#comment-14882 An audio tape without the other persons knowledge can come back to slap you. Its called entrapment. An audio tape without the other persons knowledge can come back to slap you. Its called entrapment.

]]> By: Boston http://www.nowknow.com/is-an-audio-tape-recording-of-a-conversation-without-the-other-person-knowing-admisable-in-a-nyc-court/comment-page-1/#comment-14883 Boston Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=3992#comment-14883 NY is a one-party state, meaning that only one person on the recording needs to know the conversation is being recorded. NY is a one-party state, meaning that only one person on the recording needs to know the conversation is being recorded.

]]> By: lordreith http://www.nowknow.com/is-an-audio-tape-recording-of-a-conversation-without-the-other-person-knowing-admisable-in-a-nyc-court/comment-page-1/#comment-14884 lordreith Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=3992#comment-14884 This is called a bugged or wired conversation and New York City is one of those jurisdictions that requires all parties to a conversation to consent before the conversation can be intercepted or recorded. Thus, it itself is against the law. N.Y. Penal Law §§ 250.00, 250.05 makes it a class E felony to record or listen to a conversation without the consent of the other party. No state permits recordings of this nature to be used as evidence. This is called a bugged or wired conversation and New York City is one of those jurisdictions that requires all parties to a conversation to consent before the conversation can be intercepted or recorded. Thus, it itself is against the law.
N.Y. Penal Law §§ 250.00, 250.05 makes it a class E felony to record or listen to a conversation without the consent of the other party.

No state permits recordings of this nature to be used as evidence.

]]>