<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the U.S. Supreme Court ever allow video cameras to record proceeding?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nowknow.com/will-the-u-s-supreme-court-ever-allow-video-cameras-to-record-proceeding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nowknow.com/will-the-u-s-supreme-court-ever-allow-video-cameras-to-record-proceeding/</link>
	<description>Now Know - Search Millions of Public Records &#38; Resources</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 11:49:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Red Hot chili pepper lady</title>
		<link>http://www.nowknow.com/will-the-u-s-supreme-court-ever-allow-video-cameras-to-record-proceeding/comment-page-1/#comment-8923</link>
		<dc:creator>Red Hot chili pepper lady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=2370#comment-8923</guid>
		<description>i know it would be a great way to teach but i dont think that the supreme court will allow it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know it would be a great way to teach but i dont think that the supreme court will allow it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.A.M</title>
		<link>http://www.nowknow.com/will-the-u-s-supreme-court-ever-allow-video-cameras-to-record-proceeding/comment-page-1/#comment-8924</link>
		<dc:creator>J.A.M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=2370#comment-8924</guid>
		<description>dought it. if they did that they couldnt bend the rules like they already do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dought it. if they did that they couldnt bend the rules like they already do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catawhumpus</title>
		<link>http://www.nowknow.com/will-the-u-s-supreme-court-ever-allow-video-cameras-to-record-proceeding/comment-page-1/#comment-8925</link>
		<dc:creator>catawhumpus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=2370#comment-8925</guid>
		<description>And catch Ginsberg snoring on film? If I want to see something like that I&#039;ll watch paint dry. I can read the Constitution, a bunch of thirs graders could put on a more intellectual debate and process better results, they&#039;d never want us to see that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And catch Ginsberg snoring on film? If I want to see something like that I&#8217;ll watch paint dry. I can read the Constitution, a bunch of thirs graders could put on a more intellectual debate and process better results, they&#8217;d never want us to see that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.R.</title>
		<link>http://www.nowknow.com/will-the-u-s-supreme-court-ever-allow-video-cameras-to-record-proceeding/comment-page-1/#comment-8926</link>
		<dc:creator>J.R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hebraicrenewal.com/?p=2370#comment-8926</guid>
		<description>I have seen video of Supreme Court proceedings, so I know that they have allowed it in the past.  I do not think it is a case of never allowing cameras, but likely decided on a case by case basis.  They would probably not ever allow all proceedings to be taped, however, due to the privacy rights of litigants and witnesses, such as minors and rape victims.

As they are not often in session, I do not see how they could support their own channel, 24/7, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen video of Supreme Court proceedings, so I know that they have allowed it in the past.  I do not think it is a case of never allowing cameras, but likely decided on a case by case basis.  They would probably not ever allow all proceedings to be taped, however, due to the privacy rights of litigants and witnesses, such as minors and rape victims.</p>
<p>As they are not often in session, I do not see how they could support their own channel, 24/7, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
